After accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo, President Obama will
go to Copenhagen to deliver a proposal for U.S. greenhouse gas
emissions.
Unfortunately, the President leaves for these critical international
talks on climate change shrouded in a "petroleum-powered smoke screen,
" a phrase I first heard used by Terry Tamminen, former Secretary of
California's Environmental Protection Agency.
In the United States, petroleum accounts for more than 40 % of total
CO2 emissions from all forms of fossil fuel combustion (the burning of
fuels, including coal, oil, and natural gas to produce energy and to
power vehicles) - more than any other fuel. Per capita, we Americans
remain the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the world.
Thus in order to tackle climate change, we must tackle oil.
This will not be easy, as the corporations that contribute the most
to the nation's greenhouse gas footprint also happen to be the largest
corporations (measured by revenue) on the planet. Shell is the world's
largest corporation, Exxon Mobil is second, BP is fourth, and Chevron
is fifth (Wal-Mart is the missing number 3). In fact, in 2009 for the
first time in history, seven of the ten largest corporations in the
world are now oil companies. They are, hands down, the wealthiest
corporations the world has ever known. Exxon Mobil earned the highest
profits of any corporation in world history in 2003 and has topped
those profits every single year hence. Chevron, the second largest U.S.
oil company, had 2008 revenues so large that only 36 countries had GDPs
that could top them.
This unparalleled wealth translates into vast political power--power
used to reduce and circumvent vital regulation at the state, national
and international levels to reign in these deadly emissions.
I was reminded of Tamminen's phrase a few weeks ago, when California
released its first annual greenhouse gas emissions report mandated by
the state's groundbreaking 2006 climate change law (AB 32). The report
compiles greenhouse gas emissions data from all major stationary
sources (as opposed to mobile sources like cars, trucks or trains). It
reveals that, just as in the nation as a whole, oil is the greatest
source of greenhouse gas emissions in California. Chevron is also the
state's single largest contributor. All but one of California's highest
stationary emitters are petroleum refineries: Chevron's Richmond and El
Segundo facilities, Shell's Martinez refinery, BP's Carson refinery,
and Exxon Mobil's Torrance refinery.
I interviewed Tamminen in a 2008 for my book, The Tyranny of Oil.
He told me of his efforts to include regulation (rather than just
reporting) in California's law. He first met with the state's largest
refiners and asked for their support, knowing that without it, the
draft law was dead on arrival.
Tamminen had reason to believe he would get the oil industry's
backing, given that his friend, close ally and boss, Arnold
Schwarzenegger, was a popular governor whom the industry had helped to
elect.
The oil companies, however, had a different idea about the
legislation: in return for agreeing to some regulations to reduce
emissions at their refineries, "They wanted relief from [existing]
regulatory requirements on those and any future refineries that would
have made their air pollution even worse." In other words, in order to
agree to one set of regulations, they wanted the state to allow them to
pollute even more.
Tamminen got AB 32 through, but without the regulations, and
eventually left his job, explaining that it was "nearly impossible to
perform that function [of a government regulator] sitting on the other
side of the petroleum-powered smoke screen."
Today, an even more dominant oil industry has turned its unequaled
financial power into a record-breaking lobbying blitz to stop
meaningful domestic and international climate legislation.
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the oil industry
spent more than $132 million lobbying the federal government on all
issues in 2008 (expenditures by issue area are not available), a 65%
increase over 2007, itself a record-breaking year, and 2009 is on track
to hit new heights. Of the top fifteen lobbying spenders on all issues
in 2009, four are oil companies, while the largest, the U.S. Chamber of
Commerce, is both heavily funded by the oil and fossil fuel industry
and is leading the charge against meaningful climate legislation.
The blitz is working.
It has been reported that in Copenhagen, President Obama plans to
announce reductions that mirror the targets adopted by the House of
Representatives: at best, 4% below 1990 levels by 2020. The
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has found that a 25-40% cut
from 1990 levels is required of developed countries if the world is to
have roughly a fifty-fifty shot at averting the most dangerous possible
outcomes of climate change.
For President Obama to come out in Copenhagen for regulations that
will truly save both people and the planet, then the nation will have
to learn from California's failures and force the oil industry to
behave.
Today in California, Chevron's world headquarters was surrounded by people protesting the oil company, declaring "Our climate is not your business!"
The petroleum-powered smokescreen must be exposed, blown away, and replaced with fresh air and clear skies once and for all.
Antonia Juhasz is the author of The Tyranny of Oil: the World's Most Powerful Industry--And What We Must Do To Stop It, and a Director at Global Exchange, a San Francisco-based human rights organization. She is on TOUR right now for the new updated paperback release of her book & speaking at public events in DC, NYC, TX, and Los Angeles!
|